Review

fusobacterium nucleatum subsp animalis (ATCC)

ATCC is a verified supplier

ATCC manufactures this product

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

ATCC fusobacterium nucleatum subsp animalis
Fusobacterium Nucleatum Subsp Animalis, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 99 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fusobacterium+nucleatum+subsp+animalis/Fusobacterium+nucleatum+subsp%2E+animalis+Gharbia+and+Shah/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__21__712571-238-130-134
Average 96 stars, based on 99 article reviews

fusobacterium nucleatum subsp animalis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09

96/100 stars

Images

Amplification:

Article Title: Analysis of autism spectrum disorder
Article Snippet: TABLE 24 Taxon Differences between ASD patients with and without GI disturbance Taxon log2FC P values FDR T-Stat Jonesia denitrificans DSM 20603 −1.0104 0.000157 0.039645 1661.5 Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis 1.2847 0.000138 0.039645 1651.5 Negativicutes 0.83074 0.000149 0.039645 1656.5 Arthrobacter 1.4619 0.000362 0.041513 1722.5 Acidipropionibacterium acidipropionici 0.57234 0.000235 0.041513 1692.5 Tropheryma whipplei TW08/27 0.75715 0.000377 0.041513 1725.5 Micrococcus luteus NCTC 2665 0.49797 0.000383 0.041513 1728 Cellulomonas fimi ATCC 484 0.72778 0.000445 0.042158 1745.5 Riemerella anatipestifer RA-CH-1 1.1463 0.000835 0.042824 1787 Arthrobacter sp. YC-RL1 0.57269 0.000878 0.042824 1808.5 Campylobacter pinnipediorum subsp. 1.0493 0.000883 0.042824 1797.5 pinnipediorum Trueperella pyogenes 1.2003 0.00096 0.042824 1809 Gordonia 0.88984 0.000717 0.042824 1777 Veillonella parvula DSM 2008 0.40963 0.000948 0.042824 1797 [Eubacterium] eligens ATCC 27750 0.73588 0.000836 0.042824 1790.5 Campylobacter gracilis 1.4945 0.000679 0.042824 1771 Selenomonas 1.73 0.000623 0.042824 1764 Pelosinus fermentans JBW45 −0.38341 0.001108 0.042977 1811.5 Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis 7 1 0.50384 0.001162 0.042977 1814 [Clostridium] saccharolyticum WM1 0.89781 0.001191 0.042977 1816 Fusobacterium 0.84978 0.001161 0.042977 1813.5 Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii 3 0.89022 0.001275 0.043929 1821.5 127 Brachybacterium faecium DSM 4810 0.89829 0.001449 0.045756 1833 Mycobacterium sinense 0.6082 0.001418 0.045756 1840 Micrococcales −0.11514 0.001617 0.049018 1841 Actinobacteria 0.44833 0.001842 0.049863 1852 Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis 21 0.9138 0.00178 0.049863 1849.5 1A Beutenbergia cavernae DSM 12333 0.52426 0.00179 0.049863 1852 Three of these taxons were down-regulated in ASD children with GI disturbance and 25 were up-regulated.

Positive Control:

Negative Control:

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis:

Image Search Results

The prevalence of Fusobacterium in Southern Chinese population with correlations to host conditions. (A) The prevalence of Fusobacterium in Southern Chinese population; (B) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and (C) subspecies in Southern Chinese population; (D) The correlations between Fusobacterium and host parameters. The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Journal: Microbial Biotechnology

Article Title: A Modified Method Incorporating Multiplex PCR Reveals Fusobacterium Prevalence in Southern Chinese Population and Its Correlations in Cancers

doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70292

Figure Lengend Snippet: The prevalence of Fusobacterium in Southern Chinese population with correlations to host conditions. (A) The prevalence of Fusobacterium in Southern Chinese population; (B) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and (C) subspecies in Southern Chinese population; (D) The correlations between Fusobacterium and host parameters. The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Article Snippet: F. nucleatum subsp. nucleatum (ATCC 25586), F. nucleatum subsp. nucleatum (ATCC 23726), F. nucleatum subsp. polymorphum (ATCC 10953), F. nucleatum subsp. vincentii (ATCC 49256), F. nucleatum subsp. animals (ATCC 51191), F. necrophorum ATCC (25286), Lactobacillus iners (ATCC 55195), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (ATCC 29148) were from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA).

Techniques:

The prevalence of Fusobacterium in faeces of cancer patients with correlations to host conditions. (A) The prevalence of Fusobacterium in cancer patients ( n = 254) and healthy controls ( n = 82); (B–E) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and subspecies in cancer patients ( n = 254) and healthy controls ( n = 82); (F–N) The relative abundance of FN (F), FNN (G), FNA (H), FNV (I), FNP (J), FM (K), FU (L), FV (M) and FNE (N) in faecal samples of cancer patients ( n = 254) and healthy controls ( n = 82). Mann–Whitney test. (O) The correlations between Fusobacterium and host parameters in cancer patients ( n = 254). The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. (P) The correlations between Fusobacterium and host parameters in healthy controls ( n = 82). The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. (Q) The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting cancers. AUC, the area under the ROC curve. The 95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets. (R) The prevalence of Fusobacterium in untreated ( n = 64), treated (190) and control ( n = 82) group. (S, T) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and subspecies in untreated ( n = 64), treated (190) and control ( n = 82) group. (U–AC) The relative abundance of FN (U), FNN (V), FNA (W), FNV (X), FNP (Y), FM (Z), FU (AA), FV (AB) and FNE (AC) in faecal samples of untreated ( n = 64) and treated ( n = 190) cancer patients and control group ( n = 82). Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's test. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Journal: Microbial Biotechnology

Article Title: A Modified Method Incorporating Multiplex PCR Reveals Fusobacterium Prevalence in Southern Chinese Population and Its Correlations in Cancers

doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70292

Figure Lengend Snippet: The prevalence of Fusobacterium in faeces of cancer patients with correlations to host conditions. (A) The prevalence of Fusobacterium in cancer patients ( n = 254) and healthy controls ( n = 82); (B–E) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and subspecies in cancer patients ( n = 254) and healthy controls ( n = 82); (F–N) The relative abundance of FN (F), FNN (G), FNA (H), FNV (I), FNP (J), FM (K), FU (L), FV (M) and FNE (N) in faecal samples of cancer patients ( n = 254) and healthy controls ( n = 82). Mann–Whitney test. (O) The correlations between Fusobacterium and host parameters in cancer patients ( n = 254). The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. (P) The correlations between Fusobacterium and host parameters in healthy controls ( n = 82). The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. (Q) The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting cancers. AUC, the area under the ROC curve. The 95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets. (R) The prevalence of Fusobacterium in untreated ( n = 64), treated (190) and control ( n = 82) group. (S, T) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and subspecies in untreated ( n = 64), treated (190) and control ( n = 82) group. (U–AC) The relative abundance of FN (U), FNN (V), FNA (W), FNV (X), FNP (Y), FM (Z), FU (AA), FV (AB) and FNE (AC) in faecal samples of untreated ( n = 64) and treated ( n = 190) cancer patients and control group ( n = 82). Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's test. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY, Control

The compositional features of Fusobacterium communities in colorectal cancer tissues. (A) The positive detection rate of Fusobacterium in tumour tissues ( n = 15), adjacent normal tissues ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 16). (B‐E) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and subspecies in tumour tissues ( n = 15), adjacent normal tissues ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 16). (F–N) The relative abundance of FN (F), FNN (G), FNA (H), FNV (I), FNP (J), FM (K), FU (L), FV (M) and FNE (N) in tumour ( n = 15), adjacent normal ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 16). Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's test. (O) The detection of Fusobacterium in tumour ( n = 15), adjacent normal ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 15). Their relative quantitation in the Fusobacterium community of each sample are presented as a heatmap. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium was depicted using a colour scale, where red denoted high relative abundance and blue signified low relative abundance. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Journal: Microbial Biotechnology

Article Title: A Modified Method Incorporating Multiplex PCR Reveals Fusobacterium Prevalence in Southern Chinese Population and Its Correlations in Cancers

doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70292

Figure Lengend Snippet: The compositional features of Fusobacterium communities in colorectal cancer tissues. (A) The positive detection rate of Fusobacterium in tumour tissues ( n = 15), adjacent normal tissues ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 16). (B‐E) The prevalence of Fusobacterium species and subspecies in tumour tissues ( n = 15), adjacent normal tissues ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 16). (F–N) The relative abundance of FN (F), FNN (G), FNA (H), FNV (I), FNP (J), FM (K), FU (L), FV (M) and FNE (N) in tumour ( n = 15), adjacent normal ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 16). Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's test. (O) The detection of Fusobacterium in tumour ( n = 15), adjacent normal ( n = 15) and normal tissues ( n = 15). Their relative quantitation in the Fusobacterium community of each sample are presented as a heatmap. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium was depicted using a colour scale, where red denoted high relative abundance and blue signified low relative abundance. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Techniques: Quantitation Assay

The identification of Fusobacterium in paired tumour tissues and faeces of lung cancer patients. (A, B) The prevalence of Fusobacterium (A) and Fusobacterium species (B) in paired tumour tissue ( n = 46), adjacent normal tissue ( n = 46), normal tissue ( n = 45) and faeces ( n = 48) of lung cancer patients. (C, D) The relative abundance of FN (C) and FU (D) in tumour tissue ( n = 46), adjacent normal tissue ( n = 46) and normal tissue ( n = 45) of lung cancer patients. Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's test. (E) The correlations between faecel Fusobacterium and host parameters ( n = 48). The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. (F) The detection of Fusobacterium in tumour tissue ( n = 46), adjacent normal tissue ( n = 46) and normal tissue ( n = 45) of lung cancer patients. Their relative quantitation in the Fusobacterium community of each sample are presented as a heatmap. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium was depicted using a colour scale, where red denoted high relative abundance and blue signified low relative abundance. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Journal: Microbial Biotechnology

Article Title: A Modified Method Incorporating Multiplex PCR Reveals Fusobacterium Prevalence in Southern Chinese Population and Its Correlations in Cancers

doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70292

Figure Lengend Snippet: The identification of Fusobacterium in paired tumour tissues and faeces of lung cancer patients. (A, B) The prevalence of Fusobacterium (A) and Fusobacterium species (B) in paired tumour tissue ( n = 46), adjacent normal tissue ( n = 46), normal tissue ( n = 45) and faeces ( n = 48) of lung cancer patients. (C, D) The relative abundance of FN (C) and FU (D) in tumour tissue ( n = 46), adjacent normal tissue ( n = 46) and normal tissue ( n = 45) of lung cancer patients. Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's test. (E) The correlations between faecel Fusobacterium and host parameters ( n = 48). The correlation analysis is spearman analysis. A higher absolute value of the correlation coefficient signifies a stronger correlation, with red denoting a positive correlation and blue indicating a negative correlation. The size of the nodes and the depth of their colour represent the strength of the correlation, where larger nodes and darker hues correspond to stronger correlations. An asterisk (*) denotes the p ‐value. (F) The detection of Fusobacterium in tumour tissue ( n = 46), adjacent normal tissue ( n = 46) and normal tissue ( n = 45) of lung cancer patients. Their relative quantitation in the Fusobacterium community of each sample are presented as a heatmap. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium was depicted using a colour scale, where red denoted high relative abundance and blue signified low relative abundance. FM, Fusobacterium mortiferum ; FN, Fusobacterium nucleatum ; FNA, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. animalis ; FNE, Fusobacterium necrophorum .; FNN, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ; FNP, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum ; FNV, Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii ; FU, Fusobacterium ulcerans ; FV, Fusobacterium varium .

Techniques: Quantitation Assay

Review

fusobacterium nucleatum subsp animalis (ATCC)

Structured Review

Images

Related Articles

Amplification:

Positive Control:

Negative Control:

Agarose Gel Electrophoresis:

Similar Products

Image Search Results